Iraq ~ 5 laws governing the work of the judiciary and the integrity contentious between Maliki and Nujaifi

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

5 laws governing the work of the judiciary and the integrity contentious between Maliki and Nujaifi

Confirmed among a representative on Tuesday said that there was almost a consensus to limit the process of legislation the House of Representatives, noting that the government is trying to "limit" the role of the proposed laws are not more.

The modern House of Representatives after his release, the Speaker issued a statement in which he stated his refusal request the government of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki to delay discussion 5 laws relating to apparatus judicial, regulatory, and what she said the Iraqi parliament is open to government proposals, confirmed its steadfast refusal to delay the adoption of the laws of the country needs, while attributing the Kurdistan Alliance rejected the Government's recommendations to the differences between Maliki and Osama al.

The state law refuted the existence of personal differences between the presidencies of the Government and the Parliament, confirmed that the withdrawal of the appeal of the best laws shown by the Council of Ministers later. And laws that the Government requested delay is the law of the Integrity Commission and the Financial Inspection Office and the Supreme Council of Justice and the Federal Court and the inspectors general.

Najafi said in a statement: "determined on the legislation of these laws as soon as possible to find the mechanisms and controls to eradicate corruption and fight against the corrupt and to ensure activation of the judiciary and the integrity and away from any political influences and to achieve the hopes and aspirations of Iraqis." In a statement, said Liberal MP from the bloc and a member of the Legal Committee Amir Kanani said that "there is a consensus within the House of Representatives not to withdraw any law only after the approval of Parliament."

He adds that the members of parliament, "all agreed on the need that does not pull any of the laws proposed in the House of Representatives unless it is rejected or make observations on it and then respond to the government to make amendments to them, or withdrawal, and re-considered." He denied Kanani be legal committee parliamentary received a letter demanding the withdrawal of the laws mentioned, but he adds, "We are involved in the legislation law, especially with regard to the Supreme Judicial Council and the Federal Court, while the rest of the laws (in reference to the integrity and financial control as well as Mufthien public), they need to Rewrite of some of its clauses, which may require the involvement of the government as the legislative authority.

"And on the motives behind the government's call to wait in the legislation of these laws, see the Liberal leadership in a cluster that "the government is trying to be put up bills." He continues, "In such a case would be the role of House reluctant to submit proposals for laws, as happened in the previous session when we asked to cancel the Ministry of Municipalities and Alhakaiha governorates, where the Government submitted an appeal to the Federal Court overturned a proposal by which this law."

This refers to the Iraqi MP Mohamed al-Khalidi to the presence of a large number of broken laws from previous sessions, asserts that "the government to postpone its request" does not want to endorse some of these laws or even enforce them."

The attention of the decision of the Presidency of the Council of Representatives that "the Council is the only legislator to these laws, and here, we refused to wait in the legislation of any law, especially those that need her country." And motives "wait state," says Khalidi, "We are ready to make any amendments and no cancellation or non-approval", and suggests that "laws are usually subject during the second reading of the discussion and express their observations and therefore, the door will be open to any amendments to it."

The Kurdistan Alliance MP Mahmoud Othman Afeeterv to "the existence of numerous observations on the five laws that prompts the patient Pthariaha." And demonstrates "that the observations are not limited only to the government but also to the Parliament, especially with regard to the law of inspectors general and financial control where you see the edges and there is a similarity between the regulatory laws."

Osman pointed out that "the Minister of State for Parliamentary Affairs called on to wait in the legislation of those laws because of some remarks are made," and likely to be "the resolution of this file next week," ruled out at the same time "to postpone the laws to the second legislative term, or even to the next session of Parliament."

And refused the presidency of the Council of Representatives to request the government to wait, says the leadership, a prominent Kurdish "The parties (government and parliament), record the points on each other, sometimes by government puts the ball Stadium, Parliament, and sometimes vice versa," and adds that "the differences between the two sides (Maliki and Nujaifi) as well as notes the many overlapping points in the law led to the introduction of such an idea."

Osman and stresses that "the approval of these laws require more time and discussions between the competent authorities." For his part, MP said the coalition of state law on the Keywords in a comment made by the row over the five proposed laws "rather than in person as much as a desire for government to be a partner with the Parliament of the final image out of the laws in a manner devoid of gaps."

Keywords and continues by saying that "the laws that the government requested the withdrawal, including 3 proposals for laws that were made by Parliament was not the government partners in the formulation, and the government request today to put the touches to it and will return them to the parliament to be discussed later certainly."

And calls for a close associate of Deputy Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki that "the benefit of time and re-laws to the government for review Unlike that may appeal to the Council of Ministers is passed by parliament, which means an additional delay." On the same level, said a spokesman for the Supreme Judicial Council, Abdul Sattar Bayraktar that "the decision to withdraw the laws of Parliament came to be cured more."

He said that "the Supreme Judicial Council, made his remarks about the special law through a meeting of an ad hoc committee of the latter and the Legal Committee in Parliament," explaining that "our observations are summarized points about some of the texts contained in the Act on the grounds that the judiciary well know some of these texts from the government."

The spokesperson for the Supreme Judicial Council, "The patient came to the ripening of laws and not for other reasons."
http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ar&tl=en&u=http://www.alrafidayn.com/2009-05-26-22-07-53/32084-5-.html&rurl=translate.google.com